1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 760 N.E.2d
  5. 760 N.E.2d 668 (2002)
 

HARTIG v. STRATMAN

No. 82A01-0105-CV-184.

760 N.E.2d 668 (2002)

Timothy W. HARTIG, Appellant-Defendant, v. Melvin J. STRATMAN and Louise Stratman, Appellees-Plaintiffs.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

January 9, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Burkart, Ziemer Stayman Weitzel & Shoulders, LLP, Evansville, IN, Attorney for Appellant.

Jack N. VanStone, VanStone & Kornblum, Evansville, IN, Attorney for Appellee.

OPINION

VAIDIK, Judge.

Case Summary

Timothy Hartig contends that the trial court erred in granting Melvin and Louise Stratman's Motion to Set Aside Judgment. In particular, Hartig asserts that the Stratmans were not entitled to have the judgment set aside based on newly discovered evidence because they failed to exercise due diligence in obtaining the evidence they now allege to be newly discovered. Because we find that the Stratmans did not exercise...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases