1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 798 A.2d
  5. 798 A.2d 605 (2002)
 

BD. OF EDUC. OF BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK v. UTICA MUT. INS.

798 A.2d 605 (2002)

172 N.J. 300

BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the BOROUGH OF FLORHAM PARK, Plaintiff, v. UTICA MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Respondent, and Selective Insurance Company, Defendant-Appellant.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided June 13, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sharon Handrock Moore, Clinton, argued the cause for appellant (Gebhardt & Kiefer, attorneys; Ms. Moore and Arthur D. Fialk, on the briefs).

Francis X. Garrity, Montclair, argued the cause for respondent (Garrity, Graham, Favetta & Flinn, attorneys; Rudolph G. Morabito, of counsel and on the brief).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by COLEMAN, J.

This appeal involves a dispute between two insurance companies over what triggers coverage for criminal defense indemnification expenses under their respective policies for board of education employees. We are required to decide whether it is the filing of criminal charges against an officer or employee of a board of education, or the acquittal or dismissal of the charges...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases