ADONICAN v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES

No. 01-17303.

297 F.3d 1106 (2002)

Maria Teresa ADONICAN, an individual, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a Governmental Entity, and Does 1-10, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

August 6, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lenton Aikins, The Aikins Law Firm, Long Beach, CA, for appellant Maria Teresa Adonican.

Douglas C. Smith, Bonne, Bridges, Mueller, O'Keefe & Nichols, Riverside, California; Martin Stein, Barry M. Wolf, Greines, Martin, Stein & Richland, LLP, Los Angeles, CA, for appellee City of Los Angeles.

Before BROWNING, KOZINSKI and BERZON, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

Appellee's motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction is granted.

The parties wished to have a partial summary judgment reviewed before proceeding forward with Appellant's remaining claims. They entered into an agreement that Appellant would voluntarily dismiss her remaining claims, but would have the option to refile her dismissed claims at any time up to thirty days after a decision from this Court. Appellee agreed not to raise a statute...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases