1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 232 F.Supp.2d
  5. 232 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2002)
 

JC2 v. GRAMMOND

No. CIV.01-1111-AS.

232 F.Supp.2d 1166 (2002)

JC2, ME, FH, PM, BO, BS and TS, Plaintiffs, v. Maurice GRAMMOND; the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, an Oregon corporation; the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland in Oregon, and successors, a corporation solo, dba the Archdiocese of Portland in Oregon, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Oregon.

March 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David L. Slader, David Slader Trial Lawyer, Portland, OR, for Plaintiffs.

Thomas E. Cooney, Cooney & Crew, L.L.C., Portland, OR, for Maurice Grammon, defendant.

Karen O'Kasey, Thomas V. Dulcich, Schwabe Williamson & Wyatt, Portland, OR, for Archdiocese of portland, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Portland, defendants.

ORDER

ROBERT E. JONES, District Judge.

Magistrate Judge Donald C. Ashmanskas filed Findings and Recommendation (# 24) on December 14, 2001, in the above entitled case. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). When either party objects to any portion of a magistrate judge's Findings and Recommendation, the district court must make a de novo determination of that portion of the magistrate judge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases