1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 794 A.2d
  5. 794 A.2d 596 (2002)
 

HACKETT v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

No. 267, 2001.

794 A.2d 596 (2002)

John J. HACKETT, William M. Barnes, Marie Louise Barnes, Lawrence J. Carroll, Yvonne Carroll, Charles M. Oberly, III, Prudence E. Oberly, Appellants Below, Appellants, v. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE CITY OF REHOBOTH BEACH, Appellee Below, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Decided: March 21, 2002.

Reargument Denied April 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles M. Oberly, III, Esquire (argued), Oberly, Jennings & Rhodunda, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware and William M. Barnes, Esquire, Schnader Harrison Segal & Lewis LLP, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, for Appellants.

James F. Waehler, Esquire (argued) and Mary Robin Schrider, Esquire, Tunnell & Raysor, P.A., Georgetown, Delaware, for Appellee.

Before VEASEY, Chief Justice, WALSH, and STEELE, Justices.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from an order of the Superior Court dismissing an appeal from the Board of Adjustment of the City of Rehoboth Beach because the appellants had failed to name, as a party-appellee, the property owner who secured a building variance granted by the Board. In granting a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Superior Court ruled that the property owner was an indispensable party to the appeal and any attempt to amend the notice of appeal to relate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases