1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 275 F.Supp.2d
  5. 275 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2002)
 

INAMED CORP. v. KUZMAK

No. CV 99-02160 MMM.

275 F.Supp.2d 1100 (2002)

INAMED CORPORATION, Inamed Development Company and Bioenterics Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. Lubomyr I. KUZMAK, Defendant.

United States District Court, C.D. California, Western Division.

May 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shirli Fabbri Weiss, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, Stewart M. Brown, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiffs.

Jonathan Solish, Steven J. Prough, Jenkens & Gilchrist, Marjorie E. Lewis, Gail Jeanne Standish, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Wayne M. Barsky, DoHoang Thien Duong, Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendants.

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT FOR DEFENDANTS

MORROW, District Judge.

On February 26, 1999, plaintiffs Inamed Corporation, Inamed Development Company, and Bioenterics Corporation filed a complaint against Lubomyr I. Kuzmak, seeking a declaration that certain patents held by Kuzmak were invalid and unenforceable, and that plaintiffs had not infringed the patents. Plaintiffs also alleged that Kuzmak...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases