EMERYVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY v. ELEMENTIS PIGMENTS, INC.

Nos. A090932, A091716, A093126.

125 Cal.Rptr.2d 12 (2002)

101 Cal.App.4th 1083

EMERYVILLE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. ELEMENTIS PIGMENTS, INC., Defendant and Appellant. Emeryville Redevelopment Agency, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Elementis Pigments, Inc., Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Four.

Review Denied November 13, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Natalie E. West, Oakland, Carol R. Victor, Kevin D. Siegel, Karen W. Murphy, Oakland, Michael Biddle, Emeryville, Benjamin L. Stock, Oakland, Thomas A. Douvan, for Appellant.

James M. Berg, F. Gale Connor, Jeffrey B. Kirschenbaum, San Francisco, for Respondent.

Lee C. Rosenthal, San Francisco, William F. DiCamillo, for California Redevelopment Association as Amicus Curiae.


SEPULVEDA, J.

These consolidated appeals arise from a judgment and posttrial orders in an eminent domain proceeding brought by the Emeryville Redevelopment Agency (Agency or plaintiff) to condemn about 13 acres of chemically contaminated land owned by defendant Elementis Pigments, Inc., formerly Harcros Pigments, Inc. (Elementis or defendant). The appeals, and a cross-appeal by Elementis, present numerous questions of eminent domain law. We have concluded that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases