ORFINGER, R.B., J.
The State appeals from an order suppressing certain statements made by the defendant, Dustin Alexander, as well as certain tangible evidence. We reverse.
The State does not challenge the factual findings made by the trial court. Rather, the State maintains the court's ruling amounts to an erroneous application of law subject to de novo review. See Ornelas v. United States,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
