U.S. v. JAMES

No. 99-1762.

280 F.3d 1078 (2002)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Edward JAMES, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed February 13, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jonathan Tukel (argued and briefed), Robert Cares, Assistant United States Attorney, Detroit, MI, for Appellee.

Kevin M. Schad (argued and briefed), Schad & Cook, Indian Springs, OH, for Appellant.

Before SILER, MOORE, and CLAY, Circuit Judges.


AMENDED OPINION

SILER, Circuit Judge.

Upon motion by the defendant, Edward James, for a rehearing, and good cause having been shown, and upon the concession by the government that at the time of the entry of the plea of guilty by James that the government could not have adduced any additional proof on the interstate commerce element under the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, as to James than it did at trial against the codefendants, Selena Turner and Kevin...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases