1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 648 N.W.2d
  5. 648 N.W.2d 704 (2002)
 

BULLER v. MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL

No. C8-01-2237.

648 N.W.2d 704 (2002)

Donald BULLER, et al., Appellants, v. MINNESOTA LAWYERS MUTUAL, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

June 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven S. Fuller, Fuller Law Firm, Rochester, MN, for appellants.

Rich Thomas, Burke & Thomas, St. Paul, MN, for respondent.

Considered and decided by RANDALL, Presiding Judge, STONEBURNER, Judge, and HUSPENI, Judge.

OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge.

Appellants sued the insured attorney for malpractice. Appellants and the attorney entered into a Miller-Shugart agreement,1 and appellants filed an action against respondent-insurer, seeking to declare that respondent's policy provided coverage for appellants' claim. Appellants challenge the district court's decision, adopted from the consensual special magistrate's findings of fact and conclusions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases