1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 287 F.3d
  5. 287 F.3d 1062 (2002)
 

NEOMAGIC CORP. v. TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC.,

No. 01-1631.

287 F.3d 1062 (2002)

NEOMAGIC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TRIDENT MICROSYSTEMS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

April 17, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brian E. Ferguson, McDermott, Will & Emery, of Washington, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Raphael V. Lupo, Steven A. Maddox, and Stephen K. Shahida.

Ian N. Feinberg, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, of Palo Alto, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were M. Elizabeth Day, and James Pooley, Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy LLP, of Palo Alto, CA. Of counsel was Mary A. Lehman, Gray Cary Ware & Freidenrich LLP, of San Diego, CA.

Before LOURIE, Circuit Judge, FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.

In this patent infringement suit, Neo-Magic Corp. appeals from a decision of the District Court for the District of Delaware granting summary judgment of noninfringement to Trident Microsystems, Inc. ("Trident"). NeoMagic Corp. v. Trident Microsystems, Inc., 129 F.Supp.2d 689, 698 (D.Del.2001). We affirm-in part, vacate-in-part, and remand.

I

The integrated circuit technology...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases