1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 201 F.Supp.2d
  5. 201 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2002)
 

AMERICAN PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH v. IMPACT NUTR.

No. 2:02-CV-0174C.

201 F.Supp.2d 1145 (2002)

AMERICAN PHYTOTHERAPY RESEARCH LABORATORY, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. IMPACT NUTRITION, Inc., et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division.

May 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark M. Bettilyon, Ray Quinney & Nebeker, Salt Lake City, UT, A. John Pate, Gary D. Pierce, Pate Pierce & Baird, Salt Lake City, UT, for plaintiffs.

H. Craig Hall, Chapman & Cutler, Salt Lake City, UT, David G. Hanson, Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC, Milwaukee, WI, for defendants.

ORDER

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

This case involves United States Patent No. 4,525,359 ("the '359 patent"). The '359 patent, an invention of Frank L. Greenway and Georg A. Bray, issued on June 25, 1985. The '359 patent relates to a process for achieving a selective reduction in body weight. Plaintiffs move to enjoin Defendants from infringing the asserted claims of the '359 patent.1

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases