1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 290 F.3d
  5. 290 F.3d 1055 (2002)
 

RENICK v. DUN & BRADSTREET RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT

No. 01-15117.

290 F.3d 1055 (2002)

Robert RENICK, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DUN & BRADSTREET RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed May 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

O. Randolph Bragg, Horwitz, Horwitz & Assoc., Chicago, IL, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant; Peter F. Caron, San Francisco, CA, assisted on the brief.

John H. Feeney, Murphy, Pearson, Bradley & Feeney, San Francisco, CA, argued the cause for the defendant-appellee; Scott L. Johnson assisted on the brief.

Before: WALLACE, KOZINSKI and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Renick didn't pay his phone bill. After his account became seriously past due, Dun & Bradstreet, the phone company's collection agent, sent Renick a collection notice. As required by the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § 1692g(a), the notice informed Renick that he had the right to dispute the validity of the debt within 30 days, and that Dun & Bradstreet...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases