1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 653 N.W.2d
  5. 653 N.W.2d 678 (2002)
 

HAMILTON v. OPPEN

No. 20020045.

653 N.W.2d 678 (2002)

2002 ND 185

Charles HAMILTON, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Robert OPPEN, Defendant and Appellee. and Navistar, Defendant.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

December 4, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Ward, Eaton, Van de Streek & Ward, Minot, N.D., for plaintiff and appellant.

Lyle W. Kirmis, Zuger Kirmis & Smith, Bismarck, N.D., for defendant and appellee.

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] Charles Hamilton appealed from a judgment entered on a jury verdict dismissing his personal injury action against Robert Oppen, and from an order denying his motion for new trial. We conclude the trial court did not err in ruling the jury had not rendered an improper quotient verdict, and did not abuse its discretion in refusing to allow Hamilton's expert witness to testify or in refusing to admit in evidence certain photographic evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases