ISAACSON v. ISAACSON


792 A.2d 525 (2002)

348 N.J. Super. 560

Joel Scott ISAACSON, Plaintiff-Respondent/Cross-Appellant, v. Lily ISAACSON, Defendant-Appellant/Cross-Respondent. Joel Scott Isaacson, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Lily Isaacson, Defendant-Appellant.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 8, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hanan M. Isaacs, Princeton, argued the cause for appellant/cross-respondent (Christine M. Carpenter and Mr. Isaacs, on the brief in A-3519-99T2; Mr. Isaacs, on the brief in A-1861-00T2).

Mark H. Sobel, Roseland, argued the cause for respondent/cross-appellant (Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith, Ravin, Davis & Himmel, attorneys; Mr. Sobel, of counsel in both appeals; Dina M. Vanides, on the brief in both appeals).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CARCHMAN and WELLS.


The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

Two issues dominate in these consolidated appeals from post-judgment orders in the Family Part. The first is whether an attorney appointed as a mediator to resolve ongoing economic disputes between the parties may also serve as a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of the children. While we recognize that the attorney appointed in this litigation provided...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases