1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 303 F.3d
  5. 303 F.3d 994 (2002)
 

E.E.O.C. v. LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS

Nos. 00-57222, 01-55321.

303 F.3d 994 (2002)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON, & SCRIPPS, Defendant-Appellant. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton, & Scripps, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed September 3, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Bird, Kelly Capen Douglas, Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP, San Diego, CA, for the defendant-appellant-appellee.

Robert F. Walker, Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLP, Los Angeles, CA, defendant-appellant-appellee.

Dori K. Bernstein, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Washington, DC, for the plaintiff-appellee-appellant.

Before PREGERSON and TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, District Judge.

OPINION

TROTT, Circuit Judge.

The law firm Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps LLP ("Luce Forward") refused to hire Donald Scott Lagatree ("Lagatree") as a full-time legal secretary because he would not sign an agreement to arbitrate claims arising from his employment. On behalf of Lagatree, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") sued Luce Forward for retaliation in violation of Title VII of the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases