PER CURIAM.
We reverse appellant's conviction for possession of cocaine under Count I, as the state concedes we must, because it violates double jeopardy. We affirm the conviction under Count II for introducing or possessing cocaine on the grounds of a county detention facility because we find no error in the granting of the state's motion in limine to preclude the defendant from commenting in closing argument on the failure of the state to call certain witnesses...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.