1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 233 F.Supp.2d
  5. 233 F.Supp.2d 1038 (2002)
 

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORP. v. SELFCARE INC.

No. IP 00-1103-C-M/S.

233 F.Supp.2d 1038 (2002)

ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. SELFCARE INC d/b/a Inverness Medical Technology Inc., Inverness Medical Inc., Can-Am Care Corporation, Inverness Medical Limited, a UK Corporation, Bayer Corporation, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. Indiana, Indianapolis Division.

November 26, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald Knebel, Barnes & Thornburg, Indianapolis, IN, for Plaintiff.

Daniel L. Boots, Bingham McHale LLP, Indianapolis, IN, Peter B. Ellis, Foley Hoag LLP, Boston, MA, Theresa M. Gillis, Jones Day Reavis & Pogue, New York City, Linda Pence, Sommer & Barnard, Indianapolis, IN, for Defendants.

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS

McKINNEY, Chief Judge.

This cause is now before the Court on the defendant's, Bayer Corporation ("Bayer"), motion for summary judgment of non-infringement of the plaintiff's, Roche Diagnostics Corporation ("Roche"), patent, U.S. Patent Reissue No. 36,268 ("'268 patent"). Bayer argues that summary judgment is appropriate because Roche has no data to support a finding that Bayer's accused devices infringe the "substantially...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases