1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 799 A.2d
  5. 799 A.2d 452 (2002)
 

PANITZ v. PANITZ

No. 1578, Sept. Term 2001.

799 A.2d 452 (2002)

144 Md. App. 627

Stanley I. PANITZ v. Harriet PANITZ.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

June 4, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Shale D. Stiller (Piper, Marbury, Rudnick & Wolfe LLP, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant.

Benjamin Rosenberg (Lynn E. Ricciardella and Rosenberg, Proutt, Funk & Greenberg, LLP, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before DAVIS, BARBERA, GREENE, JJ.

DAVIS, J.

In the instant appeal, we are called upon to decide whether appellant's challenge to the judgment of the lower court that he continue alimony payments to appellee despite her living arrangements with a live-in lover constitutes an innovative theory for extension or modification of the law (see Kelley v. Dowell, 81 Md.App. 338, 341, 567 A.2d 521

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases