1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 43 P.3d
  5. 43 P.3d 1207 (2002)
 

MACHADO-MILLER v. MERSEREAU & SHANNON, LLP

0004-03308; A113283

43 P.3d 1207 (2002)

180 Or. App. 586

Mia MACHADO-MILLER, Appellant, v. MERSEREAU & SHANNON, LLP, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 10, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenneth C. Mennemeier, Sacramento, California, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Mennemeier, Glassman & Stroud LLP.

Susan K. Eggum, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief was Susan K. Eggum, P.C.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.

SCHUMAN, J.

Plaintiff alleged that Mersereau, her attorney in an earlier case and a member of the law firm named as defendant in this one, committed malpractice in the earlier case, tried in United States District Court of Oregon, by failing to argue for the application of California law. The trial court in this case granted defendant's motion for summary judgment and denied plaintiff's. Plaintiff appeals. We hold that, even if defendant had argued for the application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases