BANACH v. CANNON


812 A.2d 435 (2002)

356 N.J. Super. 342

Peter BANACH, Plaintiff, v. Jamie CANNON, et al., Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Monmouth County.

Decided June 24, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert L. Witek, II, Long Branch, for plaintiff, (Resnikoff, Resnikoff & Witek, attorneys).

James W. Miskowski, Ridgewood, for defendants John and Marie Cannon.

No other appearances.


FISHER, P.J.Ch.

Plaintiff Peter Banach ("Peter") claims he fathered a child about to be born to defendant Jamie Cannon ("Jamie"). Because the constitutional rights of unwed fathers have not been viewed expansively, and prompted by Peter's inability to locate Jamie or learn the status of her pregnancy, the potential for immediate and irreparable injury to Peter's nascent rights warrants a mandatory injunction compelling defendants' turnover of relevant information...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases