1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 200 F.Supp.2d
  5. 200 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2002)
 

ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. v. PANDUIT

No. CIV.01-477 ADM/AJB.

200 F.Supp.2d 1022 (2002)

ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. PANDUIT CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota.

April 23, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Underhill, Esq., and Mark D. Schuman, Esq., Merchant & Gould, P.C., Minneapolis, Minnesota, appeared for and on behalf of the Plaintiff.

Daniel A. Boehnen, Esq., and Nicole A. Fiorella, Esq., McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff, Chicago, Illinois, and Russell S. Ponessa, Esq., Hinshaw & Culbertson, Minneapolis, Minnesota, appeared for and on behalf of the Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

MONTGOMERY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff ADC Telecommunications, Inc. ("ADC"), filed a complaint against Defendant Panduit Corporation ("Panduit"), alleging that Panduit's products infringe four of ADC's design patents and three of ADC's utility patents. On January 11, 2002, the undersigned United States District Judge heard the parties' claim construction arguments and Panduit's Motion for Summary Judgment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases