NEGRETE v. ROE

No. C 00-01334 WHA.

207 F.Supp.2d 1013 (2002)

Jose Antonio NEGRETE, Petitioner, v. Ernest ROE, Respondent.

United States District Court, N.D. California.

June 3, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Manuel J. Baglanis, San Jose, CA, for petitioner.

Karl S. Mayer, Glenn Pruden, CA State Attorney General's Office, San Francisco, CA, for respondent.


ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

ALSUP, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

In this habeas case, petitioner raises three claims of error, which respectively assert violations of the Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth, and Eighth Amendments. This order concludes that all of these claims fail, and therefore DENIES the petition. Judgment will be entered on behalf of respondent, and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases