ZAMBRANO v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE

No. 00-16191.

302 F.3d 909 (2002)

Marta ZAMBRANO; Margarita Rodriguez; Graciela Lopez; Andrea Ruiz; Martha Ozuna; Jorge Perdoma, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE; Edwin Meese; Alan Nelson, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Filed March 7, 2002.

Amended September 4, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard M. Pearl, Berkeley, CA, for the appellants.

William J. Howard and Antony W. Norwood, Office of Immigration Litigation, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for the appellees.

Before; HUG, D.W. NELSON, and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.


The Opinion filed March 7, 2002 is amended as follows: on slip opinion page 3832, last paragraph (that carries over to page 3833) [282 F.3d at 1152], change the paragraph to read:

The overall scheme of the new legislation reflects that by specifically making the repeal of § 377 retroactive to the date of the enactment of the IRCA, the statutory language was intended to remove a jurisdictional obstacle to litigation over applications pursuant to both the IRCA...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases