PRUETT v. KRAUSE GENTLE CORP.

No. 4:01-CV-40178.

226 F.Supp.2d 983 (2002)

Dana PRUETT and Mandy Wallace, Plaintiffs, v. KRAUSE GENTLE CORPORATION, d/b/a KUM & GO, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Iowa, Central Division.

October 8, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Newkirk, Kuhle Law Office, PC, West Des Moines, IA, for plaintiffs.

Thomas M. Cunningham, Pingel & Templer, PC, West Des Moines, IA, Gretchen R. Jensen, Goodman PC, West Des Moines, IA, for defendant.


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

GRITZNER, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiffs, Dana Pruett ("Pruett") and Mandy Wallace ("Wallace") filed their complaint on March 22, 2001, alleging that their former employer, Krause Gentle Corporation ("KGC"), terminated them because they were pregnant, in violation of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000(e)(k), and the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases