POLLOCK v. PATUXENT INSTITUTION BOARD OF REVIEW

No. 1030, Sept. Term, 2001.

806 A.2d 388 (2002)

146 Md. App. 54

Michael POLLOCK v. PATUXENT INSTITUTION BOARD OF REVIEW.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

September 3, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Gitomer, Owings Mills, for appellant.

Scott S. Oakley, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen. on the brief), Baltimore, for appellee.

Argued before MURPHY, C.J., ADKINS, and JOHN J. BISHOP, JR. (Retired, Specially Assigned), JJ.


ADKINS, Judge.

This appeal is the latest attempt to resolve a long-standing dispute regarding the parole revocation of Michael Pollock, appellant. We must decide whether test results indicating the presence of marijuana in a urine sample allegedly supplied by Pollock should have been excluded due to the failure of staff at Patuxent Institution ("Patuxent") to strictly follow Patuxent's procedures for collecting and documenting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases