It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from be and the same hereby is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
Defendant failed to preserve for our review his contention that Supreme Court erred in permitting the prosecutor to cross-examine the codefendant with respect to those parts of the codefendant's intercepted telephone conversation implicating defendant (see CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Molling,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.