STRICKLIN v. FLAVEL

97-2161; A112786

43 P.3d 1116 (2002)

180 Or. App. 360

Robert C. STRICKLIN and Elizabeth Stricklin, Respondents, v. Harry FLAVEL and Mary Louise Flavel, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 27, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward N. Fadeley argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellants.

James R. Herald, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were David G. Fagan and Preston Gates & Ellis, LLP.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and BREWER and SCHUMAN, Judges.


BREWER, J.

Defendants appeal from an amended money judgment in favor of plaintiffs. The amended judgment was entered after a hearing on plaintiffs' "Supplemental Motion to Enforce Settlement and Entry of Judgment" (the supplemental motion) at which defendants made no appearance. Defendants assert that they did not receive adequate notice of the hearing and that the trial court lacked authority to enter the amended judgment. We affirm.

In May 1998, plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases