1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 812 A.2d
  5. 812 A.2d 342 (2002)
 

STATE v. BROOKS

Nos. 934, 935, 937, Sept. Term, 2002.

812 A.2d 342 (2002)

148 Md. App. 374

STATE of Maryland, v. Jamar BROOKS, Latonia Brooks, and Charlton Frederick Anderson.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

December 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rachel Marblestone Kamins, Asst. Atty. Gen. (J. Jospeh Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baltimore and Joseph I. Cassily, State's Atty. for Harford County of Bel Air, on the brief), for Appellant.

Margaret A. Mead (Mead & Flynn P.A., on the brief for appellees, Jamar and Latonia Brooks), Baltimore. Counsel for appellee, Anderson adopts co-appellees' brief.

JAMES R. EYLER, GREENE, CHARLES E. MOYLAN, JR. (Ret., specially assigned), JJ.

CHARLES E. MOYLAN, Jr., Retired, Specially Assigned.

It is a well-settled principle of law that an appellate court, when reviewing a suppression hearing ruling, will accept as the basis for its analysis that version of the evidence (as well as that version of the inferences that may be drawn from the evidence) most favorable to the prevailing party. The principle is self-evidently a two-edged sword. The State, far more frequently...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases