1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 289 F.3d
  5. 289 F.3d 865 (2002)
 

BIRD v. PARSONS

No. 00-4556.

289 F.3d 865 (2002)

Darrell J. BIRD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Marshall PARSONS, Defendant, Stephen Vincent, George DeCarlo, Dotster, Inc., and Afternic.com, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Decided and Filed: May 21, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Darrell J. Bird (briefed), Dayton, OH, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Richard S. Lovering (briefed), Bricker & Eckler, Columbus, OH, Kevin A. Bowman (briefed), Sebaly, Shillito & Dyer, Dayton, OH, for Defendants-Appellees.

Before: NORRIS, SILER, and GILMAN, Circuit Judges.

OPINION

GILMAN, Circuit Judge.

Darrell J. Bird, an Ohio citizen proceeding pro se, brought this lawsuit alleging various violations of federal copyright and trademark law against Afternic.com, Inc., Dotster, Inc., George DeCarlo, Marshall Parsons, and Steven Vincent. Dotster, DeCarlo, and Vincent are citizens of Washington, Afternic has its headquarters in New York, and Parsons resides in California. Bird's allegations involve the defendants' activities...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases