LINDELL v. LITSCHER

No. 02-C-79-C.

212 F.Supp.2d 936 (2002)

Nathaniel Allen LINDELL, Loren W. Pate and Herbert Genz, Plaintiffs, v. Jon E. LITSCHER, George Daley, Sharon Zunker, Gary R. McCaughtry, Gerald Berge, Kyle K. Davidson, Peter Huibregste, Cindy O'Donnell, John Ray, Sandy Hautamaki, Beth Dittmann, Unknown Members of the Program Review Committee, Dr. Robert Wheeler, Marc Clements, Cathy Jess, Curt Jenssen, Dr. Stephen Fleck, George Kaemerer, Don Beerbaum, Lynn Oestreich, Deb Tetzlaff, Jodine Deppisch, Captain Eckstein, Cpt. Steve Scheuler, Sgt. Kroll, Cpt. Reed Richardson, C.O.II Heinz, Cpt. Dwayne Strahota, Cpt. S. Houser, Captain Wade, Goofy # 1, Cpt. Proffit, Cpt. Core, Cpt. Muranski, Lt. Chuck Pearce, Linda Alsum-O'Donovan, James Muenchow, Ellen Ray, Ms. Ray, Tom "Doe", Sgt. Janzen, Sgt. Burns, Sgt. Hottenstein, C.O. Lomen, C.O. Esser, C.O. S. Grondin, C.O Schwantz, C.O. Christian, C.O. II Mike Glamann, C.O. II Mierzejewski, J.C. Smits, C.O. II Miller, Lt. Thomas, Dave Travis, William Schultz, Laura Wood, Unidentifiable Persons, Pam Bartels, 3 Unidentifiable Persons, Goofy # 3, Dr. Campbell, Katrina Hanson, C.O. Ostrander, Nurses Renae, Ken, Ruth, Dr. Hasslehoff, Sgt. Bakken, Jim Wegner, C.O. II Friday, C.O. Shannon, Sgt. O'Rourke, Dr. Apple, Ms. Cullen, Dr. Twila Hagen, Mr. Overbo, Mr. North, Mr. Francis, Defendants. Loren W. Pate, Edward M. Singleton, and Nathaniel Allen Lindell, Petitioners, v. Jon E. Litscher, Secretary of D.O.C., et al., Respondents.

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin.

July 15, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nathaniel Lindell, Winnebago, WI, Pro Se.

Herbert D. Genz, Supermax Correctional Institution, Boscobel, WI, for Genz, Herbert Douglas.

Charles D. Hoornstra, Assistant Attorney General, Madison, WI, for Defendants Litscher, Jon E.


ORDER

CRABB, District Judge.

Nathaniel Lindell is an active litigant in this court. In three months, he submitted three separate lawsuits with hundreds of pages of material and dozens of claims. These submissions raise significant questions about the wisdom of allowing inmate plaintiffs to file multi-plaintiff complaints challenging prison conditions and practices. I conclude that as a general rule such cases are unmanageable for the parties and for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases