1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 774 N.E.2d
  5. 774 N.E.2d 371 (2002)
 

MEDRANO v. PRODUCTION ENGINEERING CO.

No. 1-01-0302.

774 N.E.2d 371 (2002)

332 Ill. App.3d 562

266 Ill.Dec. 265

Manuel MEDRANO, Plaintiff, v. PRODUCTION ENGINEERING COMPANY, et al., Defendants. Production Engineering Company, Defendant/Third-Party Plaintiff/Appellant, v. Cam Fran Tool Company, Third-Party Defendant/Appellee.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Second Division.

Rehearing Denied August 8, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert D. Kolar, Ana M. McNamara, Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess, Chicago, for Plaintiff.

David C. Van Dyke, Donald F. Ivansek, Brian A. Schroeder, Chicago, for Defendant.

Cassiday, Schade & Gloor, Chicago, for Defendant-Appellee.

Justice GORDON delivered the opinion of the court:

Production Engineering Company (Production) appeals from the denial of its motion for summary judgment and the grant of summary judgment in favor of Cam Fran Tool Company (Cam Fran). Production contends that the trial court erred in its determination of the triggering date of the limitations period involved in this indemnity action and in its determination that Cam Fran had not waived the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases