1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 222 F.Supp.2d
  5. 222 F.Supp.2d 923 (2002)
 

MENTZEL v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

No. 02-71171.

222 F.Supp.2d 923 (2002)

Barry MENTZEL, as representative of the class, Plaintiffs, v. COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

October 18, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Justin Haas, Gittleman, Paskel, Tashman & Walker, PC, Southfield, MI, for Plaintiff.

Thomas J. Tallerico, J. Adam Behrendt, Troy, MI, Jaime A. Bianchi, White & Case, First Union Financial Center, Miami, FL, for Defendant.

ORDER OF REMAND

FEIKENS, District Judge.

Before me is plaintiff's motion to remand this case, removed to this court on a diversity jurisdiction basis. This is a class-action breach of contract claim coupled with a claim under the Michigan Consumer Protection Act. M.C.L. §§ 445.901 et seq.

Plaintiff claims that there are 180,000 persons similarly situated to him and that in no event will there be any claim that exceeds $160.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases