1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 823 So.2d
  5. 823 So.2d 314 (2002)
 

INGRAM v. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES INC.

No. 5D02-1043.

823 So.2d 314 (2002)

Annette INGRAM, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. COCA-COLA ENTERPRISES, INC., et al., Respondents.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

August 16, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Madison B. McClellan, of Gary, Williams, Parenti, Finney, Lewis, McManus, Watson & Sperando, Stuart, and Edna L. Caruso, of Caruso, Burlington, Bohn & Compiani, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Petitioners.

Roland A. Sutcliffe, Jr., E. Ginnette Childs, and Katherine E. McKinley, of Zimmerman, Shuffield, Kiser & Sutcliffe, P.A., Orlando, for Respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The petitioner, Annette Ingram ["Ingram"], seeks mandamus relief to review an order of the circuit court granting the respondent, Coca-Cola Enterprises, Inc.'s ["Coca-Cola"], motion to recuse the trial judge. Ingram contends that Coca-Cola's motion for recusal was untimely and legally insufficient.

Mandamus will lie to correct a recusal based upon a mistaken decision that the recusal affidavit was legally sufficient and timely filed. See May...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases