SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. v. BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER ZONING BD.


801 A.2d 336 (2002)

352 N.J. Super. 575

SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P., and New York SMSA Limited Partnership d/b/a Bell Atlantic Mobile, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Omnipoint Communications, Inc., Plaintiff, v. BOROUGH OF UPPER SADDLE RIVER ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, the Mayor and Council of Upper Saddle River, and the Borough of Upper Saddle River, Defendants-Respondents.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 7, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory J. Czura, Ringwood, argued the cause for appellant (Czura Stilwell, attorneys; Mr. Czura, on the brief).

David L. Rutherford, Ridgewood, argued the cause for respondent Borough of Upper Saddle River Zoning Board of Adjustment.

Robert T. Regan, Westwood, argued the cause for respondents the Mayor and Council of Upper Saddle River and the Borough of Upper Saddle River.

Before Judges KING, WECKER and WINKELSTEIN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

This appeal involves the proposed construction of a wireless communications tower or "monopole" on property owned by a volunteer fire department in a residential section of the Borough of Upper Saddle River (Borough). An application for use variances submitted by three wireless communications providers who wish to collocate on the monopole was denied by the Upper Saddle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases