In view of the fact that plaintiff furnished defendant Adirondack Medical Center with a facially sufficient bill of particulars during the pendency of the present motion and considering that no conditional order was ever issued against plaintiff, we are not persuaded that Supreme Court abused its broad discretion in refusing to impose the ultimate sanction of dismissal (see, Ashline v Kestner Engrs.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.