Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his conviction of criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree should be reversed because the evidence was legally insufficient to prove the operability of the electronic dart gun recovered at the time of his arrest. However, since the defendant failed to move for a trial order of dismissal on this ground, his claim is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gray,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.