STATE AUTO. INS. CO. v. KNUTTILA

No. C4-01-2087.

645 N.W.2d 475 (2002)

STATE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant, v. Jeron KNUTTILA, Respondents, and Brian Knuttila, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

May 28, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven L. Theesfeld, Yost & Baill, LLP, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Brian R. McCarthy, McCarthy Law Firm, Duluth, for respondent Brian Knuttila.

Robert D. Tiffany, Wallace & Tiffany, Park Rapids, for respondent Jeron Knuttila.

Considered and decided by LANSING, Presiding Judge, RANDALL, Judge, and PORITSKY, Judge.


OPINION

R.A. RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant State Auto Insurance Company sought to recover damages from respondents Jeron Knuttila and Brian Knuttila in a subrogation action for a fire that damaged the insured landlord's house. The district court granted summary judgment to respondents, concluding that the subrogation action was barred under the Bruggeman doctrine. State Auto contends that Bruggeman does not apply because the Knuttilas never achieved co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases