1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 300 F.3d
  5. 300 F.3d 808 (2002)
 

PROMATEK INDUSTRIES, LTD. v. EQUITRAC CORP.

No. 00-4276.

300 F.3d 808 (2002)

PROMATEK INDUSTRIES, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. EQUITRAC CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Decided August 13, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James K. Borcia (argued), Tressler, Soderstrom, Maloney & Priess, Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

George N. Vurdelja, Jr., Vurdelja & Heaphy, Chicago, IL, for Defendant-Appellant.

Before POSNER, KANNE, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal concerns the propriety of a preliminary injunction in which one competitor, Promatek, prevailed against another, Equitrac. The preliminary injunction was issued without a hearing and Equitrac had to place language on its web page to remedy violations of the Lanham Act. Equitrac now appeals that order and because the district court did not abuse its discretion, we affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

Promatek and Equitrac are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases