1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.2d
  4. 232 F.Supp.2d
  5. 232 F.Supp.2d 867 (2002)
 

KITTLE v. CYNOCOM CORP.

Case No. C2-01-368.

232 F.Supp.2d 867 (2002)

Diane R. KITTLE, Plaintiff, v. CYNOCOM CORP., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division.

November 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell Allen Kelm, Law Offices of Russell Kelm-2, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff.

David Anthony Kadela, Littler Mendelson PC-2, Columbus, OH, for Defendant.

ORDER AND OPINION

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Cynocom Corp's ("Defendant") Motion for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

II. FACTS

Because this matter is before the Court on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, the Court views the facts in the light most favorable to Plaintiff.

Cynocom Corp...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases