DAVENPORT v. COMSTOCK HILLS-RENO

No. 37044.

46 P.3d 62 (2002)

118 Nev. 389

Milsen J. DAVENPORT, Appellant, v. COMSTOCK HILLS-RENO, a California Limited Partnership d/b/a Comstock Hills; and Reitman Reno Properties Inc., a Nevada Corporation, Respondents.

Supreme Court of Nevada.

May 17, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goedert & Michaels, Reno, for appellant.

Thorndal Armstrong Delk Balkenbush & Eisinger, Katherine F. Bobier, Reno, for respondents.

BEFORE: SHEARING, ROSE and BECKER, JJ.


OPINION

ROSE, J.

As the primary issue of this appeal, we consider the breadth of Nevada's statutes of repose, which absolutely bar any action stemming from injuries caused by a negligently designed or constructed improvement to real property after a certain period of time has passed. In this case, appellant sued the respondents for injuries that she suffered after falling from a retaining wall on their property. The district court granted summary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases