1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 801 A.2d
  5. 801 A.2d 281 (2002)
 

WEINBERG v. SPRINT CORP.

801 A.2d 281 (2002)

173 N.J. 233

Martin WEINBERG, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SPRINT CORPORATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided July 22, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Peter S. Linden, a member of the New York bar, argued the cause for appellant (Bernstein Liebhard & Lifshitz, attorneys; Mr. Linden and Robert J. Berg, on the briefs).

Russell S. Jones, Jr., a member of the Missouri bar, argued the cause for respondent (Bloom Rubenstein Karinja & Dillon, attorneys; Mr. Jones and Paul J. Dillon, on the briefs).

The opinion of the Court was delivered by LaVECCHIA, J.

In Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc., 110 N.J. 464, 541 A.2d 1063 (1988), the Court addressed the requirement that a private plaintiff sustain an ascertainable loss in order to bring a cause of action under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 to 20(Act). Meshinsky noted that the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases