1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 800 A.2d
  5. 800 A.2d 279 (2002)
 

HARTMAN v. NEW JERSEY RACING COM'N

800 A.2d 279 (2002)

352 N.J. Super. 490

Melvin HARTMAN, Elwood G. Lawton and Joseph Leonardis, Petitioners-Appellants, v. NEW JERSEY RACING COMMISSION, Respondent-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided July 2, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Timothy M. Donohue, Chatham, argued the cause for appellants (Arleo & Donohue, attorneys; Mr. Donohue and Dawn M. Donohue on the brief).

David A. Brooks, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent New Jersey Racing Commission (David Samson, Attorney General, attorney; Andrea M. Silkowitz, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Brooks, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, KESTIN and ALLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by PETRELLA, P.J.A.D.

Three owners of race horses appeal from a final determination of the New Jersey Racing Commission requiring them to return purse monies won by their horses that were under the supervision of a trainer who, unknown to them during that time, was under a suspension in New York State and, thus, held to be ineligible to participate in the races in New Jersey.

The New Jersey Racing Commission (Commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases