1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 796 A.2d
  5. 796 A.2d 283 (2002)
 

CRESCENZO v. CRANE

796 A.2d 283 (2002)

350 N.J. Super. 531

Antoinette CRESCENZO, f/k/a Antoinette Santora, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter D. CRANE, D.O., Defendant-Respondent, v. Robert J. Pinizzotto, Esq., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 6, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Gillispie, Jr. argued the cause for appellant (Bathgate, Wegener & Wolf, attorneys; Mr. Gillispie, Jr., of counsel and on the brief).

Richard J. Bolger, Toms River, argued the cause for respondent Walter D. Crane (Orlovsky, Grasso, Bolger, Mensching & Halpin, attorneys; Mr. Bolger, of counsel; Colleen L. Brandt, on the brief).

Robert M. Smolen, Mount Laurel, argued the cause for respondent Robert J. Pinizzotto (Swartz, Campbell & Detweiler, attorneys; Mr. Smolen, on the brief).

Before Judges SKILLMAN, CARCHMAN and WELLS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by CARCHMAN, J.A.D.

The authority of an attorney to issue a discovery subpoena duces tecum under the seal of the Superior Court pursuant to R. 4:14-7(c) (the Rule) "is a significant one which must be exercised in good faith and in strict adherence to the rules to eliminate potential abuses." Cavallaro v. Jamco Prop. Mgmt., 334 N.J.Super. 557, 569,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases