MANLEY v. SAIF CORP.

99-04915; A110793.

45 P.3d 1027 (2002)

181 Or. App. 431

In the Matter of the Compensation of Leo R. Manley, Claimant. Leo R. MANLEY, Petitioner, v. SAIF CORPORATION; and Housing Authority of Yamhill County, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 8, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald M. Hooton, Portland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Jerome P. Larkin argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and ARMSTRONG and KISTLER, Judges.


KISTLER, J.

In this case, the Workers' Compensation Board ruled that, even if the direct medical sequela of claimant's accepted condition was not medically stationary at the time of claim closure, SAIF had not closed his claim prematurely. We reverse and remand.

Claimant cut the middle finger of his right hand in May 1998 while working on a plumbing project. The doctor who treated claimant at the emergency room noted that he had sustained a large laceration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases