The sole contention advanced on appeal is that Supreme Court (Lamont, J.) erred in denying defendant's motion to suppress his statements as the product of a warrantless arrest without probable cause. We disagree, and accordingly affirm. It is undisputed that the basis for the arrest was the sworn statement of defendant's girlfriend relating defendant's admission to her that he had been involved in the subject burglary. Because the girlfriend was not an undisclosed informant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
