1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.2d
  4. 800 A.2d
  5. 800 A.2d 237 (2002)
 

ARCHWAY PROGRAMS, INC. v. PEMBERTON TP. BD. OF EDN.

800 A.2d 237 (2002)

352 N.J. Super. 420

ARCHWAY PROGRAMS, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, Defendant-Respondent.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided June 28, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven D. Weinstein, Cherry Hill, argued the cause for appellant (Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley, attorneys; Mr. Weinstein, on the brief).

Frederick W. Hardt, Moorestown, argued the cause for respondent (Mr. Hardt, with Pamela A. McCoy, on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, KESTIN and ALLEY.

The opinion of the court was delivered by KESTIN, J.A.D.

Plaintiff, Archway Programs, Inc. (Archway), seeks recovery under a contract or, alternatively, on theories of unjust enrichment or quantum meruit. The amount alleged in the complaint to be due is $95,795.72 for the rendition of educational services to defendant, Pemberton Township Board of Education (Board), during the 1999-2000 contract year. The Board counterclaims...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases