KANE v. LITOW

No. 00-74785.

187 F.Supp.2d 846 (2002)

Thomas KANE, Plaintiff, v. Dr. Katherine LITOW, Dr. Dan Hinshaw, James Roseborough, Paul Scheel, Dr. Alan Mellow, and Dr. Sri Mahapatra, Defendants.

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.

January 24, 2002.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas Kane, Detroit, MI, pro se.

Paul A. Wright, Oakland, MI, for Thomas Kane.

Geneva S. Halliday, U.S. Atty's Office, Detroit, MI, for Defendants.


OPINION AND ORDER

ZATKOFF, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff responded. The Court finds that the parties have adequately set forth the relevant law and facts and oral argument would not aid in the disposition of the instant motion. See E.D. MICH. L.R. 7.1(e)(2). Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the motion be decided on the briefs submitted. For the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases