1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.3d
  4. 51 P.3d
  5. 51 P.3d 979 (2002)
 

PUTZ v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONA

No. 1 CA-IC 01-0103.

51 P.3d 979 (2002)

203 Ariz. 146

Mike PUTZ & Pat Putz, husband and wife, dba Northern Construction, Petitioner Employer, v. The INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF ARIZONA, Respondent, Ernest Day, Respondent Employee, Special Fund Division/No Insurance Section, Respondent Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department C.

As Amended August 26, 2002.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jones & Miller By Kenton D. Jones, Prescott, Attorneys for Petitioner Employer.

Laura L. McGrory, Acting Chief Counsel, The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Phoenix, Attorney for Respondent.

Taylor & Associates, P.L.L.C. By Barbara J. Callaway, Phoenix, Attorneys for Respondent Employee.

The Industrial Commission of Arizona, Special Fund Division By Paula R. Eaton, Phoenix, Attorney for Respondent Party in Interest.

OPINION

HALL, Judge.

¶ 1 In this special action, petitioner employer Mike and Pat Putz, husband and wife, dba Northern Construction, request that we set aside an Industrial Commission award for compensable claim. Northern Construction asserts that the Administrative Law Judge ("ALJ") erred in determining that it was an employer subject to Arizona's Workers' Compensation Act ("Act"), Ariz.Rev.Stat. ("A.R.S.") §§ 23-901 through -1091. Because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases