KLEIN, J.
Appellant was convicted of armed sexual battery and burglary of a dwelling with battery, based on DNA evidence. He argues that the court erred in admitting the evidence because the state did not establish a chain of custody. We affirm.
The officer who took the DNA sample from appellant testified that he had collected two DNA swabs, one from the left side of appellant's mouth and one from the right side. The evidence was attached to a property receipt...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
